U.S.'s Afghan Headache: $400-a-Gallon Gasoline
OVER EASTERN AFGHANISTAN—Parachuting a barrel of fuel to a remote Afghan base takes sharp flying skills, steady nerves and flawless timing.
It also costs a lot of money—up to $400 a gallon, by military estimates.
But the Pentagon is stuck with the expense for the foreseeable future, especially given the recent deterioration in U.S.-Pakistani relations.
October 5, 2010
Aaron Favila/AP
Pakistani police officer stands guard on still smoldering oil trucks in Shikarpur, southern Pakistan on Friday Oct. 1, 2010.
The images of burning fuel trucks that were carrying fuel destined to NATO forces in Afghanistan brings home just how dependent the US military is on fossil fuels, and how fragile that supply line can be. The military has been trying to reduce its reliance on gas for a few years now. As the New York Times reports this morning it has become a strategic necessity.
“There are a lot of profound reasons for doing this, but for us at the core it’s practical,” said Ray Mabus, the Navy secretary and a former ambassador to Saudi Arabia, who has said he wants 50 percent of the power for the Navy and Marines to come from renewable energy sources by 2020. That figure includes energy for bases as well as fuel for cars and ships.
“Fossil fuel is the No. 1 thing we import to Afghanistan,” Mr. Mabus said, “and guarding that fuel is keeping the troops from doing what they were sent there to do, to fight or engage local people.”
Those massive fuel convoys have a cost that can be measured in lives. One Army study showed that for every 24 convoys that moved, one person lost their life.
The importance of reducing dependence on fossil fuels is being felt in every branch of the military. For the past few months the Air Force has been testing biofuels in aircraft. And not just slow transports, they want to certify the whole fleet, up to and including the F-22 Raptor to fly with renewable fuels.
Alternative energy makes sense for far-flung military
Monday, October 25, 2010
McCook Daily Gazette
It may be the ultimate irony that the same
military that has gone to war over fossil fuel over the years may help
kill the need to fight for oil.
The New York Times reported that the fuel the military buys for a little over $1 a gallon costs $400 to deliver to some forward operating bases.
At that rate, you don't have to be a tree-hugger to appreciate the value of generating power from solar panels or wind on-site.
Not only is hauling fuel expensive, tanker trucks on their way to Afghanistan make tempting targets for insurgents. According to one army study, for every 24 fuel convoys sent out, one soldier or civilian involved in moving the fuel is killed.
One Marine company recently arrived in the Helmand Province with portable solar panels, energy conserving lights, solar tent shields and solar chargers for computers and communications equipment. That all translates into diesel fuel that won't have to be hauled thousands of miles.
Navy Secretary Ray Mabus wants half of the power for the Navy and Marines to come from renewable energy sources by 2020, including bases as well as fuel for cars and ships.
The Navy's first hybrid vessel, a Wasp-class amphibious assault ship named the U.S.S. Makin Island, was launched last year. By running under 10 knots on electricity rather than fossil fuel, it saved 900,000 gallons of fuel on its maiden voyage from Mississippi to San Diego, compared with a conventional ship its size.
The Air Force is getting into the act, expecting to have its entire fleet certified to fly on biofuels by 2011, and has already flown test flights using a 50-50 mix of plant-based biofuel and jet fuel. The Navy started using fuel made from algae this summer. There is even a chance, officials say, the fuel could be produced near battlefields wherever the raw materials, like plants, are available.
Nebraskans, especially, should be interested in alternative energy, both because of the cost of delivering conventional energy to remote areas, and because we are in a position to be a leader in the production of alternative energy from solar, wind and biofuels.
Sadly, much of the technology we count on in modern life is a result of war -- jet engines and nuclear power, just to name two -- so we shouldn't be surprised if war gives alternative energy the kick start it needs to come into widespread use.
Let's hope today's military investment in wind, solar and biofuels helps make tomorrow's energy wars unnecessary.
© Copyright 2010 McCook Daily Gazette. All rights reserved.